Ethics and morals according to kant and aristotle

Under deontology, an act may be considered right even if the act produces a bad consequence, [35] if it follows the rule or moral law. According to the deontological view, people have a duty to act in a way that does those things that are inherently good as acts "truth-telling" for exampleor follow an objectively obligatory rule as in rule utilitarianism.

Ethics and morals according to kant and aristotle

Ancient and Classical Greece Ancient Greece. Ancient Greece was the birthplace of Western philosophical ethics. The ideas of Socrates (c. – bce), Plato, and Aristotle (– bce) will be discussed in the next caninariojana.com sudden flowering of philosophy during that period was rooted in the ethical thought of earlier centuries. Learn kant ethics aristotle with free interactive flashcards. Choose from different sets of kant ethics aristotle flashcards on Quizlet. Because Kant and Aristotle hold practically equal definitions of happiness, the difference must arise from the respective relationships between happiness and each author’s framework of morality.

Essentially, both men regarded morality from the perspective that the ends don't necessarily negate the means. Likewise, both men believed in logically deciphering what was righteous and moral.

But the basis for truly understanding them lies in understanding their differences. Both men argued that an act was moral is if were undertaken with a moral cause in mind.

More plainly stated, in There are some staunch and subtle difference between the two men.

Popular Topics

More plainly stated, in most situations, the morality of an individual is judged by his action, not by the outcome of that action. Both men believed that logic was the only way to understand the moral world. They argued that emotions alone were too subjective to be useful in making moral claims.

Both men argued and understood that there were some actions that were intrinsically evil, and should never be taken. According to Kant, the ends were never to be considered if an action were morally undertaken.

To that end, regardless of how the choice to act turned out, the act would always be moral, if it began as a moral act. For Aristotle, this belief was mostly true as well.

The fundamental difference between the two men is that Aristotle argued that if the ends were considered, found to be totally unjust, and no other alternative was present, the action would still be morally righteous if it were taken. However, if the ends were considered, found to be unmet, and a better alternative were present, but it were not taken, the action could be ruled immoral!

He argued this because the choice to do what was ill-suited for the greatest good was never a moral decision. Kant's theories are argued from a deontological perspective, in that they are not situational.

Kant believed that morality was ruled by laws and codes of actions. Aristotle argued that morality was ruled as a variance between extremes.

His theories were more teleological, because they could be situational. Aristotle argued that a person was virtuous if he upheld goodwill for the greatest good and made choices based on that ideal. For Arostotle, virtue was measurable.

Kant believed that this was a false construct, because goodwill was unquantifiable, and was determined by law so it never changed.Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics.

Immanuel Kant () is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him. This article focuses on his metaphysics and epistemology in one of his most important works, The.

Related Questions Of the feeling of shame
Moral Character (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) They are a priori, as morality must come prior to experience. We cannot derive morality from experience a posteriori because how then would we be able to recognize a moral act as being moral if there were not something already within us a priori:
Aristotle's Philosophical Theory on Ethics Essay Sample Hughes Cox lcox beta. In what follows I examine the following question:
Expert Answers Mythical accounts Introduction of moral codes When did ethics begin and how did it originate?
Posted on May 16, by Scott Alexander I. I was delighted to see nydwracu say something similar in the comments to my recent post:

Aristotle's philosophical theory on ethics is based on virtue. He argues that a virtuous person is one with acceptable character traits.

According to him, virtues develop within an individual and need to be nurtured to be stable. Ancient and Classical Greece Ancient Greece.

Ancient Greece was the birthplace of Western philosophical ethics.

Ethics and morals according to kant and aristotle

The ideas of Socrates (c. – bce), Plato, and Aristotle (– bce) will be discussed in the next caninariojana.com sudden flowering of philosophy during that period was rooted in the ethical thought of earlier centuries.

Kant vs Aristotle Ethics. Kant's standard of rationality and morals, immorality involves a violation of the CI and is thereby irrational. An unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person's inclination or purpose.

Ethics and morals according to kant and aristotle

According to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, there is a direct connection between morality and happiness. Aristotle states that happiness is the main goal of human existence. He follows this idea by saying the only way to achieve happiness is through his account of morality. Ethics (or Moral Philosophy) is concerned with questions of how people ought to act, and the search for a definition of right conduct (identified as the one causing the greatest good) and the good life (in the sense of a life worth living or a life that is satisfying or happy)..

The word "ethics" is derived from the Greek "ethos" (meaning "custom" or "habit").

ethics | Origins, History, Theories, & Applications | caninariojana.com