An argument against animal experimentation in america

Enos the space chimp before insertion into the Mercury-Atlas 5 capsule in This rat is being deprived of restful sleep using a single platform "flower pot" technique. The water is within 1 cm of the small flower pot bottom platform where the rat sits. At the onset of sleep, the rat would either fall into the water only to clamber back to the pot to avoid drowning, or its nose would become submerged into the water shocking it back to an awakened state.

An argument against animal experimentation in america

Prisoners were coerced into participating: Typically, the experiments resulted in death, disfigurement or permanent disability. At Auschwitz and other camps, under the direction of Dr. Eduard Wirths, selected inmates were subjected to various experiments which were supposedly designed to help German military personnel in combat situations, develop new weapons, aid in the recovery of military personnel that had been injured, and to advance the racial ideology backed by the Third Reich.

According to the indictment at the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials[2][3], these experiments included the following: Experiments on twins Experiments on twin children in concentration camps were created to show the similarities and differences in the genetics and eugenics of twins, as well as to see if the human body can be unnaturally manipulated.

The central leader of the experiments was Josef Mengele, who performed experiments on over 1, sets of imprisoned twins, of which fewer than individuals survived the studies. The twins were arranged by age and sex and kept in barracks between experiments, which ranged from injection of different chemicals into the eyes of twins to see whether it would change their colors to literally sewing twins together to try creating conjoined twins.

The subject is wearing a Luftwaffe garment. Inthe Luftwaffe conducted experiments to learn how to treat hypothermia. One study forced subjects to endure a tank of ice water for up to three hours. Another study placed prisoners naked in the open for several hours with temperatures below freezing.

The experimenters assessed different ways of rewarming survivors. The experiments were conducted on men to simulate the conditions the armies suffered on the Eastern Front, as the German forces were ill prepared for the bitter cold.

The experiments were conducted under the supervision of Dachau and Auschwitz. First, to establish how long it would take to lower the body temperature to death, and second how to best resuscitate the frozen victim. The icy vat method proved to be the fastest way to drop the body temperature. The selections were made of young healthy Jews or Russians.

They were usually stripped naked and prepared for the experiment. An insulated probe which measured the drop in the body temperature was inserted into the rectum. The probe was held in place by an expandable metal ring which was adjusted to open inside the rectum to hold the probe firmly in place.

The victim was put into an air force uniform, then placed in the vat of cold water and started to freeze. Malaria experiments From about February to about Aprilexperiments were conducted at the Dachau concentration camp in order to investigate immunization for treatment of malaria.

Healthy inmates were infected by mosquitoes or by injections of extracts of the mucous glands of female mosquitoes. After contracting the disease, the subjects were treated with various drugs to test their relative efficiency.

Over 1, people were used in these experiments, and of those, more than half died as a result. Test subjects were deliberately exposed to mustard gas and other vesicants, which inflicted severe chemical burns.

You are here

Infection was aggravated by forcing wood shavings and ground glass into the wounds.The Top Arguments Against Animal Rights. Search the site GO. Issues.

An argument against animal experimentation in america

Animal Rights Basics Animals in Entertainment Animals Used for Food Wildlife Management U.S. Government U.S. Foreign Policy This is a twisted argument. All animals absolutely have a purpose in . “The Animal Research War is a lively, occasionally terrifying account of the assault on animal research that will interest non-researchers and researchers alike, and will be illustrative to those in law enforcement and public affairs and to the media reporting on this topic.” Summary: Animal “rights” is of course not the only philosophical basis for extending legal protections to animals.

Another, competing, basis is based on the theory of utilitarianism – the outright rejection of rights for all species and instead advocacy for equal consideration.

Nonconsensual Medical Experiments on Human Beings

William Lane Craig is a prolific Christian philosopher, apologist, author, and public debater. He is the best debater – on any topic – that I’ve ever heard. As far as I can tell, he has won nearly all his debates with debating him, atheists have consistently failed to put forward solid arguments, and consistently failed to point out the flaws in Craig’s arguments.

Animal rights is the idea in which some, or all, non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests—such as the need to avoid suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings..

Its advocates oppose the assignment of moral value and fundamental protections on the basis of species membership alone. Improvements in medicine and surgery during the last two centuries have greatly extended the average lifetime of people and reduced the pain and disability following various injuries and diseases.

Because medicine and surgery have a strong basis in scientific knowledge, it is absolutely necessary for medical progress that there be experiments on humans.

Animal Testing -